Re: [PATCH 1/1] jump_label: tidy jump_label_ratelimit.h

On 08/20/2014 10:58 PM, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > I have submitted two patches according to you suggestions: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/20/885 > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/20/883 > Hope I have made them right > Thanks - they look good to me. -Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the li

Re: [PATCH 1/1] jump_label: tidy jump_label_ratelimit.h

ernel.org, da...@davemloft.net, > han...@stressinduktion.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Zhouyi Zhou" > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] jump_label: tidy jump_label_ratelimit.h > > Yes, that looks good. While at it I grep'd the tree for > 'CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL', and found some

Re: [PATCH 1/1] jump_label: tidy jump_label_ratelimit.h

Yes, that looks good. While at it I grep'd the tree for 'CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL', and found some uses in the netfilter code which should probably be 'HAVE_JUMP_LABEL' as well. Thanks, -Jason On 08/20/2014 05:29 AM, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > jump_label_ratelimit.h is split from jump_label.h to enable the

[PATCH 1/1] jump_label: tidy jump_label_ratelimit.h

jump_label_ratelimit.h is split from jump_label.h to enable the includers who don't want linux/workqueue.h. As HAVE_JUMP_LABEL is only defined in jump_label.h, will following patch makes jump_labe_ratelimit.h more tidy? Compiled and Tested in x86_64 Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou --- include/linu