On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 03:11:29 +0800
Nan Li wrote:
> This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial ports,
> because the Linux kernel interprets a break on the serial console as a SysRq,
> but there is currently no way to pass this signal over a pseudo-terminal.
> This patch
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 03:11:29 +0800
Nan Li n...@suse.com wrote:
This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial ports,
because the Linux kernel interprets a break on the serial console as a SysRq,
but there is currently no way to pass this signal over a pseudo-terminal.
This
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:03:58 -0500
Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 02/16/2015 08:04 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM, Nan Li wrote:
> >> This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial ports,
> >> because the Linux kernel interprets a break on the serial console as a
On 02/16/2015 08:04 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM, Nan Li wrote:
>> This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial ports,
>> because the Linux kernel interprets a break on the serial console as a
>> SysRq, but there is currently no way to pass this signal over
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:03:58 -0500
Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 02/16/2015 08:04 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM, Nan Li wrote:
This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial ports,
because the Linux kernel interprets a break on the
On 02/16/2015 08:04 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM, Nan Li wrote:
This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial ports,
because the Linux kernel interprets a break on the serial console as a
SysRq, but there is currently no way to pass this signal over a
On 02/16/2015 01:30 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 02/16/2015 12:16 PM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:24:16 -0500
>> Peter Hurley wrote:
>>> On 02/16/2015 08:22 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:04:02 -0500
Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM,
On 02/16/2015 12:16 PM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:24:16 -0500
> Peter Hurley wrote:
>
>> Hi Petr,
>>
>> On 02/16/2015 08:22 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
>>> On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:04:02 -0500
>>> Peter Hurley wrote:
>>>
On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM, Nan Li wrote:
> This will
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:24:16 -0500
Peter Hurley wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> On 02/16/2015 08:22 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:04:02 -0500
> > Peter Hurley wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM, Nan Li wrote:
> >>> This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial
Hi Petr,
On 02/16/2015 08:22 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:04:02 -0500
> Peter Hurley wrote:
>
>> On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM, Nan Li wrote:
>>> This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial ports,
>>> because the Linux kernel interprets a break on the serial
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:04:02 -0500
Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM, Nan Li wrote:
> > This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial ports,
> > because the Linux kernel interprets a break on the serial console as a
> > SysRq, but there is currently no way to pass
On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM, Nan Li wrote:
> This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial ports,
> because the Linux kernel interprets a break on the serial console as a SysRq,
> but there is currently no way to pass this signal over a pseudo-terminal.
> This patch will work for
This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial ports, because
the Linux kernel interprets a break on the serial console as a SysRq, but there
is currently no way to pass this signal over a pseudo-terminal. This patch will
work for transmitting BREAK from master to slave through
Hi Petr,
On 02/16/2015 08:22 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:04:02 -0500
Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM, Nan Li wrote:
This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial ports,
because the Linux kernel interprets a break on
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:24:16 -0500
Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
Hi Petr,
On 02/16/2015 08:22 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:04:02 -0500
Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM, Nan Li wrote:
This will greatly enhance the
On 02/16/2015 12:16 PM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:24:16 -0500
Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
Hi Petr,
On 02/16/2015 08:22 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:04:02 -0500
Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM, Nan Li
On 02/16/2015 01:30 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 02/16/2015 12:16 PM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:24:16 -0500
Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 02/16/2015 08:22 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:04:02 -0500
Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 08:04:02 -0500
Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM, Nan Li wrote:
This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial ports,
because the Linux kernel interprets a break on the serial console as a
SysRq, but there is
On 02/05/2015 02:11 PM, Nan Li wrote:
This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial ports,
because the Linux kernel interprets a break on the serial console as a SysRq,
but there is currently no way to pass this signal over a pseudo-terminal.
This patch will work for
This will greatly enhance the usefulness of QEMU virtual serial ports, because
the Linux kernel interprets a break on the serial console as a SysRq, but there
is currently no way to pass this signal over a pseudo-terminal. This patch will
work for transmitting BREAK from master to slave through
20 matches
Mail list logo
