On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:02:47PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:15:39PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 07:11:39PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > > Because period and duty cycle are defined as ints with units of
> > > nanoseconds, the
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:15:39PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 07:11:39PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > Because period and duty cycle are defined as ints with units of
> > nanoseconds, the maximum time duration that can be set is limited to
> > ~2.147 seconds. Chan
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 07:11:39PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> Because period and duty cycle are defined as ints with units of
> nanoseconds, the maximum time duration that can be set is limited to
> ~2.147 seconds. Change their definitions to u64 so that higher durations
> may be set.
>
>
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 07:11:39PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> Because period and duty cycle are defined as ints with units of
> nanoseconds, the maximum time duration that can be set is limited to
> ~2.147 seconds. Change their definitions to u64 so that higher durations
> may be set.
>
>
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 07:11:39PM -0700, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> Because period and duty cycle are defined as ints with units of
> nanoseconds, the maximum time duration that can be set is limited to
> ~2.147 seconds. Change their definitions to u64 so that higher durations
> may be set.
>
>
Because period and duty cycle are defined as ints with units of
nanoseconds, the maximum time duration that can be set is limited to
~2.147 seconds. Change their definitions to u64 so that higher durations
may be set.
Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh
---
drivers/pwm/core.c | 4 ++--
drivers/p
6 matches
Mail list logo