Hi Petr,
sorry for not reacting sooner, I was on holiday, saw your message but figured
it wasn't super critical.
Thanks for finding this issue and thank you Pierre and Vasily for stepping in.
Best,
Niklas Schnelle
On 5/28/20 11:08 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just a gentle ping.
>
>
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:01:45PM +0200, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
> On 2020-05-28 11:08, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > just a gentle ping.
> >
> > If the current behaviour (logging the original handle) was intended,
> > then it was worth mentioning in the commit message for 17cdec960cf77
On 2020-05-28 11:08, Petr Tesarik wrote:
Hi all,
just a gentle ping.
If the current behaviour (logging the original handle) was intended,
then it was worth mentioning in the commit message for 17cdec960cf77,
which made the change, but since that's no longer an option, I'd be
happy with an exp
Hi all,
just a gentle ping.
If the current behaviour (logging the original handle) was intended,
then it was worth mentioning in the commit message for 17cdec960cf77,
which made the change, but since that's no longer an option, I'd be
happy with an explanation in email.
Petr T
On Fri, 22 May 20
After disabling a function, the original handle is logged instead of
the disabled handle.
Fixes: 17cdec960cf77 (s390/pci: Recover handle in clp_set_pci_fn())
Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik
---
arch/s390/pci/pci_clp.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/pc
5 matches
Mail list logo