On 2/11/21 11:47 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:21:26 -0500
Tony Krowiak wrote:
Yes, it makes sense. I guess I didn't look closely at your
suggestion when I said it was exactly what I implemented
after agreeing with Connie. I had a slight difference in
my implementation:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:21:26 -0500
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> Yes, it makes sense. I guess I didn't look closely at your
> suggestion when I said it was exactly what I implemented
> after agreeing with Connie. I had a slight difference in
> my implementation:
>
> static void
On 2/11/21 7:23 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 15:34:24 -0500
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 2/10/21 5:53 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:48:30 -0500
Tony Krowiak wrote:
This patch fixes a circular locking dependency in the CI introduced by
commit f21916ec4826
On 2/10/21 5:46 PM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:05:48 -0500
Tony Krowiak wrote:
On 2/10/21 10:32 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:24:29 +0100
Halil Pasic wrote:
Maybe you could
- grab a reference to kvm while holding the lock
- call the mask handling
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 15:34:24 -0500
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 2/10/21 5:53 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:48:30 -0500
> > Tony Krowiak wrote:
> >
> >> This patch fixes a circular locking dependency in the CI introduced by
> >> commit f21916ec4826 ("s390/vfio-ap: clean up
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:05:48 -0500
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 2/10/21 10:32 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:24:29 +0100
> > Halil Pasic wrote:
> >
> >>> Maybe you could
> >>> - grab a reference to kvm while holding the lock
> >>> - call the mask handling functions with that
On 2/10/21 10:24 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:53:34 +0100
Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:48:30 -0500
Tony Krowiak wrote:
This patch fixes a circular locking dependency in the CI introduced by
commit f21916ec4826 ("s390/vfio-ap: clean up vfio_ap resources
On 2/10/21 10:32 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:24:29 +0100
Halil Pasic wrote:
Maybe you could
- grab a reference to kvm while holding the lock
- call the mask handling functions with that kvm reference
- lock again, drop the reference, and do the rest of the processing?
I
On 2/10/21 5:53 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:48:30 -0500
Tony Krowiak wrote:
This patch fixes a circular locking dependency in the CI introduced by
commit f21916ec4826 ("s390/vfio-ap: clean up vfio_ap resources when KVM
pointer invalidated"). The lockdep only occurs when
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:24:29 +0100
Halil Pasic wrote:
> > Maybe you could
> > - grab a reference to kvm while holding the lock
> > - call the mask handling functions with that kvm reference
> > - lock again, drop the reference, and do the rest of the processing?
>
> I agree, matrix_mdev->kvm
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:53:34 +0100
Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:48:30 -0500
> Tony Krowiak wrote:
>
> > This patch fixes a circular locking dependency in the CI introduced by
> > commit f21916ec4826 ("s390/vfio-ap: clean up vfio_ap resources when KVM
> > pointer invalidated").
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:48:30 -0500
Tony Krowiak wrote:
> This patch fixes a circular locking dependency in the CI introduced by
> commit f21916ec4826 ("s390/vfio-ap: clean up vfio_ap resources when KVM
> pointer invalidated"). The lockdep only occurs when starting a Secure
> Execution guest.
This patch fixes a circular locking dependency in the CI introduced by
commit f21916ec4826 ("s390/vfio-ap: clean up vfio_ap resources when KVM
pointer invalidated"). The lockdep only occurs when starting a Secure
Execution guest. Crypto virtualization (vfio_ap) is not yet supported for
SE guests;
13 matches
Mail list logo
