On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:20:33 +0100
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:47:48 +0100
> Petr Tesarik wrote:
>
> > The driver uses test_facility(), but does not include the
> > corresponding include file explicitly. The driver currently builds
> > only thanks to the following include chain:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:47:48 +0100
Petr Tesarik wrote:
> The driver uses test_facility(), but does not include the
> corresponding include file explicitly. The driver currently builds
> only thanks to the following include chain:
>
> vfio_ap_drv.c
>
>
>
>
>
On 11/16/2018 11:47 AM, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> The driver uses test_facility(), but does not include the
> corresponding include file explicitly. The driver currently builds
> only thanks to the following include chain:
>
> vfio_ap_drv.c
>
>
>
>
>
>
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:47:48 +0100
Petr Tesarik wrote:
> The driver uses test_facility(), but does not include the
> corresponding include file explicitly. The driver currently builds
> only thanks to the following include chain:
>
> vfio_ap_drv.c
>
>
>
>
>
The driver uses test_facility(), but does not include the
corresponding include file explicitly. The driver currently builds
only thanks to the following include chain:
vfio_ap_drv.c
Files should not rely on such fragile implicit inclu
5 matches
Mail list logo