On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 10:59:25PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> Any chance that we could have the fixes backported to the stable queue, in
> particular to the 3,2 kernel? We should then be able to run the Debian built
> SMP kernel on the autobuilders at Debian-Ports rather than having to run a
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 10:09:36AM +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > arch/alpha and probably some other architectures call
> > do_notify_resume()->task_work_run() with irqs disabled.
>
> I'm going to ignore this patch because I *hope* it is u
On Sat 13 October 2012 14:09:36 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > arch/alpha and probably some other architectures call
> > do_notify_resume()->task_work_run() with irqs disabled.
>
> I'm going to ignore this patch because I *hope* it is unnecessary
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 10:09:36AM +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > arch/alpha and probably some other architectures call
> > do_notify_resume()->task_work_run() with irqs disabled.
>
> I'm going to ignore this patch because I *hope* it is u
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> arch/alpha and probably some other architectures call
> do_notify_resume()->task_work_run() with irqs disabled.
I'm going to ignore this patch because I *hope* it is unnecessary
after the pull from Al that I just did.
But if that turns out
arch/alpha and probably some other architectures call
do_notify_resume()->task_work_run() with irqs disabled.
This wasn't noticed because key_replace_session_keyring() and
then task_work_run() did spin_lock_irq() + spin_unlock_irq(),
but this sequence was removed by 9da33de6.
Add local_irq_enable
6 matches
Mail list logo