Re: [PATCH 1/1] thermal/powerclamp: correct cpu support check

2016-10-07 Thread Jacob Pan
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016 08:56:49 -0700 Eric Ernst wrote: > Initial logic for checking CPU match resulted in OR of CPU features > rather than the intended AND. > > Updated to use boot_cpu_has macro rather than x86_match_cpu. > > In addition, MWAIT is the only required

Re: [PATCH 1/1] thermal/powerclamp: correct cpu support check

2016-10-07 Thread Jacob Pan
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016 08:56:49 -0700 Eric Ernst wrote: > Initial logic for checking CPU match resulted in OR of CPU features > rather than the intended AND. > > Updated to use boot_cpu_has macro rather than x86_match_cpu. > > In addition, MWAIT is the only required CPU feature for idle >

[PATCH 1/1] thermal/powerclamp: correct cpu support check

2016-10-06 Thread Eric Ernst
Initial logic for checking CPU match resulted in OR of CPU features rather than the intended AND. Updated to use boot_cpu_has macro rather than x86_match_cpu. In addition, MWAIT is the only required CPU feature for idle injection to work. Drop other feature requirements since they are only

[PATCH 1/1] thermal/powerclamp: correct cpu support check

2016-10-06 Thread Eric Ernst
Initial logic for checking CPU match resulted in OR of CPU features rather than the intended AND. Updated to use boot_cpu_has macro rather than x86_match_cpu. In addition, MWAIT is the only required CPU feature for idle injection to work. Drop other feature requirements since they are only