Hi,
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:27:03PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Hi Rich,
> > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:52:31PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > > > + update code where needed (include in code which
> > > > included only to get struct sysinfo or SI_LOAD_SHIFT).
> > > > The reason is to avo
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:27:03PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:52:31PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > > + update code where needed (include in code which
> > > included only to get struct sysinfo or SI_LOAD_SHIFT).
>
> > > The reason is to avoid indirect
Hi Rich,
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:52:31PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > + update code where needed (include in code which
> > included only to get struct sysinfo or SI_LOAD_SHIFT).
> > The reason is to avoid indirect include when using
> > some network headers: or others [1] ->
> > -> .
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:52:31PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> + update code where needed (include in code which
> included only to get struct sysinfo or SI_LOAD_SHIFT).
>
> The reason is to avoid indirect include when using
> some network headers: or others [1] ->
> -> .
>
> This indirect in
+ update code where needed (include in code which
included only to get struct sysinfo or SI_LOAD_SHIFT).
The reason is to avoid indirect include when using
some network headers: or others [1] ->
-> .
This indirect include causes redefinition of struct sysinfo when
included both and some of
5 matches
Mail list logo