Re: [PATCH 1/1] udf: block-based fs should use generic_write_end()

On Thu 19-03-15 23:37:59, Taesoo Kim wrote: > simple_write_end() is for non-block fs, which doesn't invoke > mark_inode_dirty(). Instead, generic_write_end() correctly > handles such case when i_size has changed. > > Signed-off-by: Taesoo Kim So simple_write_end() is actually correct in that pl

[PATCH 1/1] udf: block-based fs should use generic_write_end()

simple_write_end() is for non-block fs, which doesn't invoke mark_inode_dirty(). Instead, generic_write_end() correctly handles such case when i_size has changed. Signed-off-by: Taesoo Kim --- fs/udf/file.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/udf/file.c b/fs/ud