Hi,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 02:36:24AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> On Monday 22 October 2012 13:56:01 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Monday 22 October 2012 03:33:19 Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
> > > > On Saturday,
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 02:36:24AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Felipe,
On Monday 22 October 2012 13:56:01 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2012 03:33:19 Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
On Saturday, October 20,
Hi Felipe,
On Monday 22 October 2012 13:56:01 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 22 October 2012 03:33:19 Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
> > > On Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at
Hi Simon,
On Monday 22 October 2012 12:49:51 Simon Haggett wrote:
> On 22/10/12 11:47, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 22 October 2012 03:33:19 Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
> >> On Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Simon Haggett
Hi Simon,
On Monday 22 October 2012 12:49:51 Simon Haggett wrote:
On 22/10/12 11:47, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2012 03:33:19 Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
On Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Simon Haggett wrote:
Hi Felipe,
On Monday 22 October 2012 13:56:01 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Monday 22 October 2012 03:33:19 Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
On Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:19:26PM
Hi
On 22/10/12 11:47, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 22 October 2012 03:33:19 Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
On Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Simon Haggett wrote:
Some gadget drivers may attempt to dequeue requests for an
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 22 October 2012 03:33:19 Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Simon Haggett wrote:
> > > > Some gadget drivers
Hi,
On Monday 22 October 2012 03:33:19 Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
> On Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Simon Haggett wrote:
> > > Some gadget drivers may attempt to dequeue requests for an endpoint
> > > that has already been
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:33:19AM +, Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:ba...@ti.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM
> > To: Simon Haggett
> > Cc: Li Yang-R58472; Felipe Balbi; Greg Kroah-Hartman; linux-
> >
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:33:19AM +, Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:ba...@ti.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM
To: Simon Haggett
Cc: Li Yang-R58472; Felipe Balbi; Greg Kroah-Hartman; linux-
u...@vger.kernel.org;
Hi,
On Monday 22 October 2012 03:33:19 Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
On Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Simon Haggett wrote:
Some gadget drivers may attempt to dequeue requests for an endpoint
that has already been disabled. For
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:47:21PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 22 October 2012 03:33:19 Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
On Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Simon Haggett wrote:
Some gadget drivers may attempt
Hi
On 22/10/12 11:47, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 22 October 2012 03:33:19 Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
On Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Simon Haggett wrote:
Some gadget drivers may attempt to dequeue requests for an
> -Original Message-
> From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:ba...@ti.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM
> To: Simon Haggett
> Cc: Li Yang-R58472; Felipe Balbi; Greg Kroah-Hartman; linux-
> u...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; Laurent
-Original Message-
From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:ba...@ti.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM
To: Simon Haggett
Cc: Li Yang-R58472; Felipe Balbi; Greg Kroah-Hartman; linux-
u...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; Laurent Pinchart
Some gadget drivers may attempt to dequeue requests for an endpoint that has
already been disabled. For example, in the UVC gadget driver,
uvc_function_set_alt()
will call usb_ep_disable() when alt setting 0 is selected. When the userspace
application subsequently issues the VIDIOC_STREAMOFF
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Simon Haggett wrote:
> Some gadget drivers may attempt to dequeue requests for an endpoint that has
> already been disabled. For example, in the UVC gadget driver,
> uvc_function_set_alt()
> will call usb_ep_disable() when alt setting 0 is selected.
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Simon Haggett wrote:
Some gadget drivers may attempt to dequeue requests for an endpoint that has
already been disabled. For example, in the UVC gadget driver,
uvc_function_set_alt()
will call usb_ep_disable() when alt setting 0 is selected. When
Some gadget drivers may attempt to dequeue requests for an endpoint that has
already been disabled. For example, in the UVC gadget driver,
uvc_function_set_alt()
will call usb_ep_disable() when alt setting 0 is selected. When the userspace
application subsequently issues the VIDIOC_STREAMOFF
20 matches
Mail list logo