Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Convert cpuinfo_x86 array to a per_cpu array v2

2007-09-24 Thread Mike Travis
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:30:05 -0700 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> cpu_data is currently an array defined using NR_CPUS. This means that >> we overallocate since we will rarely really use maximum configured cpus. >> When NR_CPU count is raised to 4096 the size of cpu_data be

Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Convert cpuinfo_x86 array to a per_cpu array v2

2007-09-21 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:30:05 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > cpu_data is currently an array defined using NR_CPUS. This means that > we overallocate since we will rarely really use maximum configured cpus. > When NR_CPU count is raised to 4096 the size of cpu_data becomes > 3,145,728 bytes. This

[PATCH 1/1] x86: Convert cpuinfo_x86 array to a per_cpu array v2

2007-09-20 Thread travis
v2: rebasing on 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 (This resulted in one change removed and one change added.) cpu_data is currently an array defined using NR_CPUS. This means that we overallocate since we will rarely really use maximum configured cpus. When NR_CPU count is raised to 4096 the size of cpu_data become