Re: [PATCH 1/1 linux-next] Btrfs: use BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE instead of 0

2015-03-31 Thread David Sterba
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:21:11PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote: > cow_file_range_inline() was called with 0 instead of > actual definition. Please also fix the initialization in btrfs_finish_ordered_io . -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Re: [PATCH 1/1 linux-next] Btrfs: use BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE instead of 0

2015-03-31 Thread David Sterba
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:21:11PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote: cow_file_range_inline() was called with 0 instead of actual definition. Please also fix the initialization in btrfs_finish_ordered_io . -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a

[PATCH 1/1 linux-next] Btrfs: use BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE instead of 0

2015-03-30 Thread Fabian Frederick
cow_file_range_inline() was called with 0 instead of actual definition. Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 686331f..f626519 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++

[PATCH 1/1 linux-next] Btrfs: use BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE instead of 0

2015-03-30 Thread Fabian Frederick
cow_file_range_inline() was called with 0 instead of actual definition. Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick f...@skynet.be --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 686331f..f626519 100644 ---