2007/7/17, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Why not just allow kmem_cache_free() to allow NULL like other functions
> > in the kernel?
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> It seems there was discussion about this and no conclusion
> yet?
IIRC the patch was rejected by relevant maintainers
2007/7/17, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 10:50:28PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> This patch fixes out of memory error handling in sysfs_new_dirent().
> kmem_cache_free() with NULL is not allowed.
Why not just allow kmem_cache_free() to allow NULL like other functions
in th
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 10:50:28PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> This patch fixes out of memory error handling in sysfs_new_dirent().
> kmem_cache_free() with NULL is not allowed.
Why not just allow kmem_cache_free() to allow NULL like other functions
in the kernel?
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscr
This patch fixes out of memory error handling in sysfs_new_dirent().
kmem_cache_free() with NULL is not allowed.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/sysfs/dir.c | 13 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
In
4 matches
Mail list logo