On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > The pss is going to need accessor functions, preferably inlined, and the
> > comment adjusted stating that all accesses should be through those
> > functions and not directly to the mem_size_stats struct.
> >
> > static inline u64 pss_up(unsigned
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 04:36:38PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Matt Mackall wrote:
>
> > Index: l/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> > ===
> > --- l.orig/fs/proc/task_mmu.c 2007-10-14 13:35:31.0 -0500
> > +++ l
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Matt Mackall wrote:
> Index: l/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> ===
> --- l.orig/fs/proc/task_mmu.c 2007-10-14 13:35:31.0 -0500
> +++ l/fs/proc/task_mmu.c 2007-10-14 13:36:56.0 -0500
> @@ -122,6 +122,27 @
From: Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The "proportional set size" (PSS) of a process is the count of pages it has
in memory, where each page is divided by the number of processes sharing
it. So if a process has 1000 pages all to itself, and 1000 shared with one
other process, its PSS will be 150
4 matches
Mail list logo