On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 23:27 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, February 02, 2013 08:28:01 PM Steven Newbury wrote:
> > > > Tried merging with linux-pm/bleeding-edge, same behaviour:
> > > >
> > > > [ 3589.013578] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.PCIE.GDCK: undocking
> > > > [ 3589.585356] vgaarb: devi
On Saturday, February 02, 2013 08:28:01 PM Steven Newbury wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2013, 20:18:28 GMT, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, February 02, 2013 11:58:41 AM Steven Newbury wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 15:19 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:41 PM
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013, 20:18:28 GMT, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, February 02, 2013 11:58:41 AM Steven Newbury wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 15:19 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki
> > > wrote:
> > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > > >
On Saturday, February 02, 2013 11:58:41 AM Steven Newbury wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 15:19 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > >
> > > There is no guarantee that acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim() will
> > >
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 15:19 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > There is no guarantee that acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim() will
> > not be run in parallel for the same scope of the ACPI namespace,
> > which m
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 15:19 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > There is no guarantee that acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim() will
> > not be run in parallel for the same scope of the ACPI namespace,
> > which m
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> There is no guarantee that acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim() will
> not be run in parallel for the same scope of the ACPI namespace,
> which may lead to a great deal of confusion, so introduce a new mutex
>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
There is no guarantee that acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim() will
not be run in parallel for the same scope of the ACPI namespace,
which may lead to a great deal of confusion, so introduce a new mutex
to prevent that from happening.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
---
8 matches
Mail list logo