On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 02:53:33PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> The pwm-backlight driver is moving to use the gpiod interface,
> which has its own mapping mechanism for platform data GPIOs.
> These mappings carry GPIO properties like active low so they don't have
> to be explicitly handled by
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 02:53:33PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
The pwm-backlight driver is moving to use the gpiod interface,
which has its own mapping mechanism for platform data GPIOs.
These mappings carry GPIO properties like active low so they don't have
to be explicitly handled by
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 11:33:00PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> >> >> On
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
>> >> On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Ping, can I
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 11:33:00PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han
Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> >> On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this
>
Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
>> On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>>
>>> Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this
>>> patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this
patch?
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>
>> Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this
>> patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used in any code, is replaced by
>> gpiod, and we would like to remove
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this
> patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used in any code, is replaced by
> gpiod, and we would like to remove it altogether from pwm_bl. Thanks!
OK, I see. It looks
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this
patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used in any code, is replaced by
gpiod, and we would like to remove it altogether from pwm_bl. Thanks!
OK, I see. It looks good.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this
patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used in any code, is replaced by
gpiod, and we would like
Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this
patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used in any code, is replaced by
gpiod, and we would like to remove it altogether from pwm_bl. Thanks!
Alex.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> The pwm-backlight driver
Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this
patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used in any code, is replaced by
gpiod, and we would like to remove it altogether from pwm_bl. Thanks!
Alex.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Alexandre Courbot acour...@nvidia.com wrote:
The
The pwm-backlight driver is moving to use the gpiod interface,
which has its own mapping mechanism for platform data GPIOs.
These mappings carry GPIO properties like active low so they don't have
to be explicitly handled by GPIO consumers.
Because of this change, the enable_gpio_flags member of
The pwm-backlight driver is moving to use the gpiod interface,
which has its own mapping mechanism for platform data GPIOs.
These mappings carry GPIO properties like active low so they don't have
to be explicitly handled by GPIO consumers.
Because of this change, the enable_gpio_flags member of
18 matches
Mail list logo
