Re: [PATCH 1/2] Account for module percpu space separately from kernel percpu

2007-04-10 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> I think I have already done this but in case I haven't. >> Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> I see any problems there. >> > ^don't? Yep. I did not see any problems with the patch. Eric - To u

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Account for module percpu space separately from kernel percpu

2007-04-10 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Eric W. Biederman wrote: > I think I have already done this but in case I haven't. > Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I see any problems there. > ^don't? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] M

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Account for module percpu space separately from kernel percpu

2007-04-10 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Rather than using a single constant PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM, compute it as > the sum of kernel_percpu + PERCPU_MODULE_RESERVE. This is now common > to all architectures; if an architecture wants to set > PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM to something special, then it

[PATCH 1/2] Account for module percpu space separately from kernel percpu

2007-04-10 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Rather than using a single constant PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM, compute it as the sum of kernel_percpu + PERCPU_MODULE_RESERVE. This is now common to all architectures; if an architecture wants to set PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM to something special, then it may do so (ia64 is the only one which does). Signed-off