Jivin James Morris lays it down ...
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, David McCullough wrote:
>
> > As for permission to use a dual license, I will gladly approach the
> > authors if others feel it is important to know the possibility of it at this
> > point,
>
> Please do so. It would be useful to have
Jivin James Morris lays it down ...
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, David McCullough wrote:
As for permission to use a dual license, I will gladly approach the
authors if others feel it is important to know the possibility of it at this
point,
Please do so. It would be useful to have the
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, David McCullough wrote:
> As for permission to use a dual license, I will gladly approach the
> authors if others feel it is important to know the possibility of it at this
> point,
Please do so. It would be useful to have the option of using an already
developed, debugged
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, David McCullough wrote:
As for permission to use a dual license, I will gladly approach the
authors if others feel it is important to know the possibility of it at this
point,
Please do so. It would be useful to have the option of using an already
developed, debugged
Jivin James Morris lays it down ...
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
>
> > However, developing two different APIs isn't particular efficient. I
> > know, at the moment there isn't much choice, as J.Morris hasn't commited
> > to acrypto in anyway.
>
> There is also the OCF port
Jivin James Morris lays it down ...
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
However, developing two different APIs isn't particular efficient. I
know, at the moment there isn't much choice, as J.Morris hasn't commited
to acrypto in anyway.
There is also the OCF port (OpenBSD
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
> However, developing two different APIs isn't particular efficient. I
> know, at the moment there isn't much choice, as J.Morris hasn't commited
> to acrypto in anyway.
There is also the OCF port (OpenBSD crypto framework) to consider, if
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
However, developing two different APIs isn't particular efficient. I
know, at the moment there isn't much choice, as J.Morris hasn't commited
to acrypto in anyway.
There is also the OCF port (OpenBSD crypto framework) to consider, if
permission
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 17:40 +0100, Michal Ludvig wrote:
> > Is there any connection to Evgeniy Polyakov's acrypto work? It appears,
> > that there are two project for one objective. Would be nice to see both
> > parties pulling on one string.
>
> These projects do not compete at all. Evgeniy's
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 17:40 +0100, Michal Ludvig wrote:
Is there any connection to Evgeniy Polyakov's acrypto work? It appears,
that there are two project for one objective. Would be nice to see both
parties pulling on one string.
These projects do not compete at all. Evgeniy's work is a
10 matches
Mail list logo
