On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 19:28 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> If the 0x1000 Unified Battery Level Status feature exists, expose the battery
> level.
>
> The main drawback is that while a device is plugged in its battery level is 0.
> To avoid exposing that as 0% charge we make up a number based on th
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 04:35:45PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 19:28 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > +static int hidpp_battery_get_property(struct power_supply *psy,
> > + enum power_supply_property psp,
> > +
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> Hmm, I think before this gets pushed to Linus' tree, we'll also need to
> have battery support for HID++ 1.0 devices too (upower seems to be
> handling them, so this would introduce a regression). So depending on
> how much work we can do, it mig
On Jul 08 2016 or thereabouts, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > Sorry about not being able to test this before it was merged for
> > inclusion.
>
> This is just in a topic branch of hid.git as of now, so we can still tweak
> things (including API) if/as neede
On Jul 08 2016 or thereabouts, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 16:35 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 19:28 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > > +static int hidpp_battery_get_property(struct power_supply *psy,
> > > + enum power_
On Jul 08 2016 or thereabouts, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 19:28 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > +static int hidpp_battery_get_property(struct power_supply *psy,
> > + enum power_supply_property psp,
> > + un
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Sorry about not being able to test this before it was merged for
> inclusion.
This is just in a topic branch of hid.git as of now, so we can still tweak
things (including API) if/as needed.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 16:35 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 19:28 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > +static int hidpp_battery_get_property(struct power_supply *psy,
> > + enum power_supply_property
> > psp,
> > +
On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 19:28 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> +static int hidpp_battery_get_property(struct power_supply *psy,
> + enum power_supply_property psp,
> + union power_supply_propval
> *val)
> +{
> + struct hidpp_
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 01:21:08AM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 19:28 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > If the 0x1000 Unified Battery Level Status feature exists, expose the
> > battery
> > level.
> >
> > The main drawback is that while a device is plugged in its battery
> >
On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 19:28 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> If the 0x1000 Unified Battery Level Status feature exists, expose the
> battery
> level.
>
> The main drawback is that while a device is plugged in its battery
> level is 0.
> To avoid exposing that as 0% charge we make up a number based o
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> If the 0x1000 Unified Battery Level Status feature exists, expose the battery
> level.
>
> The main drawback is that while a device is plugged in its battery level is 0.
> To avoid exposing that as 0% charge we make up a number based on the charging
>
If the 0x1000 Unified Battery Level Status feature exists, expose the battery
level.
The main drawback is that while a device is plugged in its battery level is 0.
To avoid exposing that as 0% charge we make up a number based on the charging
status.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
Signed-off-by: B
13 matches
Mail list logo
