On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 1:48 AM Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> On Thu 2020-08-27 13:52:22, Raul E Rangel wrote:
> > The i8042_mutex must be held by writers of the AUX and KBD ports, as
> > well as users of i8042_command. There were a lot of users of
> > i8042_command that were not calling i8042_lock_chip
On Thu 2020-08-27 13:52:22, Raul E Rangel wrote:
> The i8042_mutex must be held by writers of the AUX and KBD ports, as
> well as users of i8042_command. There were a lot of users of
> i8042_command that were not calling i8042_lock_chip/i8042_unlock_chip.
> This resulted in i8042_commands being iss
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:12 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:52 PM Raul E Rangel wrote:
> >
> > The i8042_mutex must be held by writers of the AUX and KBD ports, as
> > well as users of i8042_command. There were a lot of users of
> > i8042_command that were not calling i8
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:12 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:52 PM Raul E Rangel wrote:
...
> > + mutex_lock(&i8042_mutex);
> > +
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&i8042_lock, flags);
> > retval = __i8042_command(param, command);
> > spin_unlock_irqres
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:52 PM Raul E Rangel wrote:
>
> The i8042_mutex must be held by writers of the AUX and KBD ports, as
> well as users of i8042_command. There were a lot of users of
> i8042_command that were not calling i8042_lock_chip/i8042_unlock_chip.
> This resulted in i8042_commands b
The i8042_mutex must be held by writers of the AUX and KBD ports, as
well as users of i8042_command. There were a lot of users of
i8042_command that were not calling i8042_lock_chip/i8042_unlock_chip.
This resulted in i8042_commands being issues in between PS/2
transactions.
This change moves the
6 matches
Mail list logo
