Re: [PATCH 1/2] LICENSES: Add note to CDDL-1.0 license that it should not be used

2018-10-15 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:23:07PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > I'd rather replace the 'GPL-2.0' with something like '$GPL-COMPATIBLE-ID' > > and say explicitely in the prosa text that CCDL can only be used with OR > > and not with AND. > >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] LICENSES: Add note to CDDL-1.0 license that it should not be used

2018-10-15 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:23:07PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > I'd rather replace the 'GPL-2.0' with something like '$GPL-COMPATIBLE-ID' > > and say explicitely in the prosa text that CCDL can only be used with OR > > and not with AND. > >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] LICENSES: Add note to CDDL-1.0 license that it should not be used

2018-10-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:23:07PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > I'd rather replace the 'GPL-2.0' with something like '$GPL-COMPATIBLE-ID' > and say explicitely in the prosa text that CCDL can only be used with OR > and not with AND. Maybe we should take the whole thing to a higher level, and

Re: [PATCH 1/2] LICENSES: Add note to CDDL-1.0 license that it should not be used

2018-10-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:23:07PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > I'd rather replace the 'GPL-2.0' with something like '$GPL-COMPATIBLE-ID' > and say explicitely in the prosa text that CCDL can only be used with OR > and not with AND. Maybe we should take the whole thing to a higher level, and

Re: [PATCH 1/2] LICENSES: Add note to CDDL-1.0 license that it should not be used

2018-10-10 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018, Hans de Goede wrote: > The only reason we have the CDDL-1.0 license text around is for some > dual-licensed files from virtualbox. New code should not use this license. > > Add a note about this and change the example tag to be dual-licensed. > > Signed-off-by: Hans de

Re: [PATCH 1/2] LICENSES: Add note to CDDL-1.0 license that it should not be used

2018-10-10 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018, Hans de Goede wrote: > The only reason we have the CDDL-1.0 license text around is for some > dual-licensed files from virtualbox. New code should not use this license. > > Add a note about this and change the example tag to be dual-licensed. > > Signed-off-by: Hans de

[PATCH 1/2] LICENSES: Add note to CDDL-1.0 license that it should not be used

2018-10-10 Thread Hans de Goede
The only reason we have the CDDL-1.0 license text around is for some dual-licensed files from virtualbox. New code should not use this license. Add a note about this and change the example tag to be dual-licensed. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- LICENSES/other/CDDL-1.0 | 4 +++- 1 file

[PATCH 1/2] LICENSES: Add note to CDDL-1.0 license that it should not be used

2018-10-10 Thread Hans de Goede
The only reason we have the CDDL-1.0 license text around is for some dual-licensed files from virtualbox. New code should not use this license. Add a note about this and change the example tag to be dual-licensed. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede --- LICENSES/other/CDDL-1.0 | 4 +++- 1 file