>>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 2:22 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steven Rostedt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
>> This patch adds a new critical-section primitive pair:
>>
>> "migration_disable()" and "migration_enable()"
>
> This is similar to w
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> This patch adds a new critical-section primitive pair:
>
> "migration_disable()" and "migration_enable()"
This is similar to what Mathieu once posted:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/11/13
Not sure the arguments against (no time to read the thread agai
This patch adds a new critical-section primitive pair:
"migration_disable()" and "migration_enable()"
This allows you to force a task to remain on the current cpu, while
still remaining fully preemptible. This is a better alternative to
modifying current->cpus_allowed because you dont have to wo
3 matches
Mail list logo