Hi,
On 3/13/21 8:46 AM, Wang Qing wrote:
> platform_get_irq() has already checked and printed the return value,
> the printing here is nothing special, it is not necessary at all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing
Thanks, patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede
Regards,
Hans
> ---
Hello again. :-)
Now, 2 patches to the different files shouldn't have and identical subject!
And the patch
subject should reflect the exact patch locus, e.g. "sata_highbank: delete
redundant printing
of return value".
On 3/13/21 10:47 AM, Wang Qing wrote:
> platform_get_irq() has already ch
Hello!
The patch subject should reflect the exact patch locus, e.g. "ata:
libahci_platform:
delete redundant printing of return value".
On 3/13/21 10:46 AM, Wang Qing wrote:
> platform_get_irq() has already checked and printed the return value,
> the printing here is nothing special, it is
platform_get_irq() has already checked and printed the return value,
the printing here is nothing special, it is not necessary at all.
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing
---
drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c b/dr
platform_get_irq() has already checked and printed the return value,
the printing here is nothing special, it is not necessary at all.
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing
---
drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform
5 matches
Mail list logo