Re: [PATCH 1/2] audit: show user land backtrace as part of audit context messages

2021-02-02 Thread Ondrej Mosnacek
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:46 PM Paul Moore wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:44 PM Daniel Walker (danielwa) > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 04:35:42PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:29 PM Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > From: Victor Kamensky > > > > > > > > To efficie

Re: [PATCH 1/2] audit: show user land backtrace as part of audit context messages

2021-02-02 Thread Paul Moore
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:44 PM Daniel Walker (danielwa) wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 04:35:42PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:29 PM Daniel Walker wrote: > > > From: Victor Kamensky > > > > > > To efficiently find out where SELinux AVC denial is comming from > > > take

Re: [PATCH 1/2] audit: show user land backtrace as part of audit context messages

2021-02-02 Thread Daniel Walker (danielwa)
On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 04:35:42PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:29 PM Daniel Walker wrote: > > From: Victor Kamensky > > > > To efficiently find out where SELinux AVC denial is comming from > > take backtrace of user land process and display it as type=UBACKTRACE > > messag

Re: [PATCH 1/2] audit: show user land backtrace as part of audit context messages

2021-02-02 Thread Paul Moore
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:29 PM Daniel Walker wrote: > From: Victor Kamensky > > To efficiently find out where SELinux AVC denial is comming from > take backtrace of user land process and display it as type=UBACKTRACE > message that comes as audit context for SELinux AVC and other audit > messages

[PATCH 1/2] audit: show user land backtrace as part of audit context messages

2021-02-02 Thread Daniel Walker
From: Victor Kamensky To efficiently find out where SELinux AVC denial is comming from take backtrace of user land process and display it as type=UBACKTRACE message that comes as audit context for SELinux AVC and other audit messages. By default UBACKTRACE context messages are off. Needs to be e