Re: [PATCH 1/2] autofs: revert take more care to not update last_used on path walk

On Mon, Nov 27 2017, Ian Kent wrote: > While the patch of commit 092a53452b helped (partially) resolve a > problem where automounts were not expiring due to aggressive accesses > from user space it has a side effect for very large environments. > > This change helps with the expire problem by

Re: [PATCH 1/2] autofs: revert take more care to not update last_used on path walk

On Mon, Nov 27 2017, Ian Kent wrote: > While the patch of commit 092a53452b helped (partially) resolve a > problem where automounts were not expiring due to aggressive accesses > from user space it has a side effect for very large environments. > > This change helps with the expire problem by

[PATCH 1/2] autofs: revert take more care to not update last_used on path walk

While the patch of commit 092a53452b helped (partially) resolve a problem where automounts were not expiring due to aggressive accesses from user space it has a side effect for very large environments. This change helps with the expire problem by making the expire more aggressive but, for very

[PATCH 1/2] autofs: revert take more care to not update last_used on path walk

While the patch of commit 092a53452b helped (partially) resolve a problem where automounts were not expiring due to aggressive accesses from user space it has a side effect for very large environments. This change helps with the expire problem by making the expire more aggressive but, for very