Re: [Update][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util()

2016-08-11 Thread Steve Muckle
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:03:47AM -0700, Steve Muckle wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 03:49:07AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/fair.c > > === > > --- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/fair.c > > +++ linux-

Re: [Update][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util()

2016-08-11 Thread Steve Muckle
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 03:49:07AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/fair.c > === > --- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -2875,11 +2875,8 @@ static inline void updat

[Update][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util()

2016-08-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki It is useful to know the reason why cpufreq_update_util() has just been called and that can be passed as flags to cpufreq_update_util() and to the ->func() callback in struct update_util_data. However, doing that in addition to passing the util and max arguments they alre

[PATCH 1/2] cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util()

2016-08-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki It is useful to know the reason why cpufreq_update_util() has just been called and that can be passed as flags to cpufreq_update_util() and to the ->func() callback in struct update_util_data. However, doing that in addition to passing the util and max arguments they alre