Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs/livepatch: Add new compiler considerations doc

2024-05-29 Thread Marcos Paulo de Souza
From: mpdeso...@suse.com On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 15:45:33 +0200 (CEST) Miroslav Benes wrote: > Hi, > > first, I'm sorry for the late reply. Thanks, Josh, for the reminder. > > CCing Nicolai. Nicolai, could you take a look at the proposed > documentation too, please? You have more up-to-date

Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs/livepatch: Add new compiler considerations doc

2020-09-02 Thread Miroslav Benes
Hi, first, I'm sorry for the late reply. Thanks, Josh, for the reminder. CCing Nicolai. Nicolai, could you take a look at the proposed documentation too, please? You have more up-to-date experience. On Tue, 21 Jul 2020, Joe Lawrence wrote: > +Examples > + > + > +Interprocedural

Re: refactoring livepatch documentation was Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs/livepatch: Add new compiler considerations doc

2020-09-02 Thread Miroslav Benes
[side note: So not only that my INBOX is a mess after the summer. I also lost some emails apparently. I'm really sorry about that. ] CCing Nicolai too. > Hi Petr, Josh, > > The compiler optimization pitfall document can wait for refactored livepatch > documentation if that puts it into better

Re: refactoring livepatch documentation was Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs/livepatch: Add new compiler considerations doc

2020-09-01 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 03:46:46PM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote: > > > > > I'm thinking a newcomer reading this might be lost. It's not > > > > > necessarily clear that there are currently two completely different > > > > > approaches to creating a livepatch module, each with their own quirks > > >

refactoring livepatch documentation was Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs/livepatch: Add new compiler considerations doc

2020-08-10 Thread Joe Lawrence
On 8/6/20 8:03 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: On Wed 2020-07-22 15:51:39, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 01:03:03PM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote: On 7/21/20 7:04 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:14:06PM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote: Compiler optimizations can have

Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs/livepatch: Add new compiler considerations doc

2020-08-06 Thread Petr Mladek
On Wed 2020-07-22 15:51:39, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 01:03:03PM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote: > > On 7/21/20 7:04 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:14:06PM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote: > > > > Compiler optimizations can have serious implications on

Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs/livepatch: Add new compiler considerations doc

2020-07-22 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 01:03:03PM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote: > On 7/21/20 7:04 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:14:06PM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote: > > > Compiler optimizations can have serious implications on livepatching. > > > Create a document that outlines common

Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs/livepatch: Add new compiler considerations doc

2020-07-22 Thread Joe Lawrence
On 7/21/20 7:04 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:14:06PM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote: Compiler optimizations can have serious implications on livepatching. Create a document that outlines common optimization patterns and safe ways to livepatch them. Signed-off-by: Joe

Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs/livepatch: Add new compiler considerations doc

2020-07-21 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:14:06PM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote: > Compiler optimizations can have serious implications on livepatching. > Create a document that outlines common optimization patterns and safe > ways to livepatch them. > > Signed-off-by: Joe Lawrence There's a lot of good info

[PATCH 1/2] docs/livepatch: Add new compiler considerations doc

2020-07-21 Thread Joe Lawrence
Compiler optimizations can have serious implications on livepatching. Create a document that outlines common optimization patterns and safe ways to livepatch them. Signed-off-by: Joe Lawrence --- .../livepatch/compiler-considerations.rst | 220 ++