Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: lzo: fix first byte interpretation off-by-one

2020-05-22 Thread Dave Rodgman
Your update looks correct to me, thanks. Dave On 22/05/2020, 15:11, "C. Masloch" wrote: There was an error in the description of the initial byte's interpretation. While "18..21" was listed as "copy 0..3 literals", it should actually be interpreted as "copy 1..4 literals". Th

[PATCH 1/2] docs: lzo: fix first byte interpretation off-by-one

2020-05-22 Thread C. Masloch
There was an error in the description of the initial byte's interpretation. While "18..21" was listed as "copy 0..3 literals", it should actually be interpreted as "copy 1..4 literals". The "byte - 17" part is correct. 17 would encode copying "zero" literals, but does not occur. 18 encodes copyin