Hi Heiko,

> On 10.04.2019, at 16:50, Heiko Stübner <he...@sntech.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> Am Mittwoch, 10. April 2019, 16:10:44 CEST schrieb Christoph Muellner:
>> On our RK3399-Q7 EVK base board we have the option to connect an arbitrary
>> monitor via DP cable. The actual monitor is therefore not known in advance.
>> This means, we don't have any panel information besides the EDID
>> data from the device itself.
> 
> Just so I understand correctly, you have a real dp-connector wired to
> the Analogix dp-controller, and therefore want to connect actual
> monitors to it.
> 
> So the problem you're trying to work around is probably that the
> rockchip-driver of the analogix controller explictly expects a bridge
> to be present during probe, right?
> 
> I think hacking up the panel-driver is not an ideal approach:
> (1) bridges/panels do expect to stay connected all the time
>    and are meant for devices with actual hard-wired displays with specific
>    power-sequence requirements
> (2) devicetree is expected to describe the real hardware, therefore the
>    dt should not describe one thing while the actual hardware is really
>    different
> 
> So, I guess a more ideal approach could perhaps be to:
> (1) define a "dp-connector" devicetree binding, see
>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/connector/hdmi-connector.txt
>    for a similar one
> (2) steal an idea from drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi.c and check
>    for that new compatible:
>       if (!of_device_is_compatible(remote, "hdmi-connector")) {
>               //move bridge handling here
>       }
> 
>    and modify both the rockchip-part and the generic analogix bridge code
>    to work with the connector declared instead of a panel?

Thank's for you input on this.

Modelling the connector instead of the panel is indeed a better approach,
since we can then also react to connect/disconnect events (after probe).

Thanks,
Christoph

> 
>> The functionality for a 'simple-panel' has been remove a couple
>> of years ago with 81cf32b. This patch brings this feature back.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Muellner <christoph.muell...@theobroma-systems.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
>> index 9e8218f6a3f2..1f69283f3e4b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
>> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static int panel_simple_disable(struct drm_panel *panel)
>>              backlight_update_status(p->backlight);
>>      }
>> 
>> -    if (p->desc->delay.disable)
>> +    if (p->desc && p->desc->delay.disable)
>>              msleep(p->desc->delay.disable);
>> 
>>      p->enabled = false;
>> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static int panel_simple_unprepare(struct drm_panel 
>> *panel)
>> 
>>      regulator_disable(p->supply);
>> 
>> -    if (p->desc->delay.unprepare)
>> +    if (p->desc && p->desc->delay.unprepare)
>>              msleep(p->desc->delay.unprepare);
>> 
>>      p->prepared = false;
>> @@ -220,11 +220,13 @@ static int panel_simple_prepare(struct drm_panel 
>> *panel)
>> 
>>      gpiod_set_value_cansleep(p->enable_gpio, 1);
>> 
>> -    delay = p->desc->delay.prepare;
>> -    if (p->no_hpd)
>> -            delay += p->desc->delay.hpd_absent_delay;
>> -    if (delay)
>> -            msleep(delay);
>> +    if (p->desc) {
>> +            delay = p->desc->delay.prepare;
>> +            if (p->no_hpd)
>> +                    delay += p->desc->delay.hpd_absent_delay;
>> +            if (delay)
>> +                    msleep(delay);
>> +    }
>> 
>>      p->prepared = true;
>> 
>> @@ -238,7 +240,7 @@ static int panel_simple_enable(struct drm_panel *panel)
>>      if (p->enabled)
>>              return 0;
>> 
>> -    if (p->desc->delay.enable)
>> +    if (p->desc && p->desc->delay.enable)
>>              msleep(p->desc->delay.enable);
>> 
>>      if (p->backlight) {
>> @@ -280,6 +282,9 @@ static int panel_simple_get_timings(struct drm_panel 
>> *panel,
>>      struct panel_simple *p = to_panel_simple(panel);
>>      unsigned int i;
>> 
>> +    if (!p->desc)
>> +            return 0;
>> +
>>      if (p->desc->num_timings < num_timings)
>>              num_timings = p->desc->num_timings;
>> 
>> @@ -2536,6 +2541,9 @@ static const struct panel_desc arm_rtsm = {
>> 
>> static const struct of_device_id platform_of_match[] = {
>>      {
>> +            .compatible = "simple-panel",
>> +            .data = NULL,
>> +    }, {
>>              .compatible = "ampire,am-480272h3tmqw-t01h",
>>              .data = &ampire_am_480272h3tmqw_t01h,
>>      }, {
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to