On 10/24/2013 07:17 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> After all this I completely forgot the problem I'm trying to solve here. The
>> issue is that with HOTPLUG & request_microcode_nowait(), if the microcode
>> image
>> is not found (that is
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> After all this I completely forgot the problem I'm trying to solve here. The
> issue is that with HOTPLUG & request_microcode_nowait(), if the microcode
> image
> is not found (that is the file is not found on disk), then EACH cpu waits 1
> minute and
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>
> On 10/23/2013 09:21 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> After all this I completely forgot the problem I'm trying to solve here.
>>> The
>>> issue is that with HOTPLUG & request_
On 10/23/2013 09:21 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>>
>> After all this I completely forgot the problem I'm trying to solve here. The
>> issue is that with HOTPLUG & request_microcode_nowait(), if the microcode
>> image
>> is not found (that is
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
> After all this I completely forgot the problem I'm trying to solve here. The
> issue is that with HOTPLUG & request_microcode_nowait(), if the microcode
> image
> is not found (that is the file is not found on disk), then EACH cpu wait
On 10/23/2013 06:36 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>
> On 10/23/2013 12:16 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>> On 10/21/2013 10:35 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
That is why NOHOTPLUG isn't encouraged to be taken, actually
I don't suggest you to
On 10/23/2013 12:16 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> On 10/21/2013 10:35 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>
>>> That is why NOHOTPLUG isn't encouraged to be taken, actually
>>> I don't suggest you to do that too, :-)
>> Okay ... I can certainly switch to HOTP
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 10/21/2013 10:35 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>
>> That is why NOHOTPLUG isn't encouraged to be taken, actually
>> I don't suggest you to do that too, :-)
> Okay ... I can certainly switch to HOTPLUG.
OK, that should be the right approach.
>
>
On 10/21/2013 10:35 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/21/2013 08:24 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
If request_firmware_nowait() is called with uevent == NULL, the firmware
complet
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>
> On 10/21/2013 08:24 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>>> If request_firmware_nowait() is called with uevent == NULL, the firmware
>>> completion is never marked complete resulting in a hang
On 10/21/2013 08:24 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> If request_firmware_nowait() is called with uevent == NULL, the firmware
>> completion is never marked complete resulting in a hang in the process.
>>
>> If uevent is undefined, that means we're
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> If request_firmware_nowait() is called with uevent == NULL, the firmware
> completion is never marked complete resulting in a hang in the process.
>
> If uevent is undefined, that means we're not waiting on anything and the
> process should
If request_firmware_nowait() is called with uevent == NULL, the firmware
completion is never marked complete resulting in a hang in the process.
If uevent is undefined, that means we're not waiting on anything and the
process should just clean up and complete. While we're at it, add a
debug dev_d
13 matches
Mail list logo
