Hi,
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 18:06 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > I agree with Kumar on removing this. If we decide it is something worth
> > > keeping, logic to support it doesn't belong in the QUP driver, but in
> > > the i2c core.
> >
> > I don't have strong objection here, will remove aliase
> > I agree with Kumar on removing this. If we decide it is something worth
> > keeping, logic to support it doesn't belong in the QUP driver, but in
> > the i2c core.
>
> I don't have strong objection here, will remove aliases support.
When resubmitting, please test against v3.12-rcX.
of_i2c_r
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 08:59 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> [Hmm. Fixing b0rked LKML address; that might explain why I am not
> seeing Kumar's replies.]
>
Yes, sorry about this.
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:08:57PM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > Hi Kumar,
> >
> > On Fri, 2013-08-30 at
[Hmm. Fixing b0rked LKML address; that might explain why I am not
seeing Kumar's replies.]
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:08:57PM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> Hi Kumar,
>
> On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 10:21 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > On Aug 29, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > >>> +
> > >
4 matches
Mail list logo
