> > WS> Doesn't the non-DT case need fixing, too?
> >
> > Arguably yes.
>
> Yes, and it's also a one line fix. Should I do it in a separate
> patch or should I change this one and resubmit?
Resubmit please.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 09.10.2013 08:14, ext Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> "WS" == Wolfram Sang writes:
>
> WS> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote:
>>> If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
>>> -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
>>> module again to get it
> "WS" == Wolfram Sang writes:
WS> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote:
>> If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
>> -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
>> module again to get it working.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu
WS> Doesn't
WS == Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de writes:
WS On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote:
If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
-EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
module again to get it working.
Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu
On 09.10.2013 08:14, ext Peter Korsgaard wrote:
WS == Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de writes:
WS On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote:
If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
-EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
module again to get it
WS Doesn't the non-DT case need fixing, too?
Arguably yes.
Yes, and it's also a one line fix. Should I do it in a separate
patch or should I change this one and resubmit?
Resubmit please.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote:
> If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
> -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
> module again to get it working.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu
Doesn't the non-DT case need fixing, too?
> ---
>
> "IN" == Ionut Nicu writes:
IN> If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
IN> -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
IN> module again to get it working.
IN> Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu
Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard
--
Sorry about disclaimer - It's out of my
If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
-EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
module again to get it working.
Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu
---
drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
-EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
module again to get it working.
Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu ioan.nicu@nsn.com
---
drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff
IN == Ionut Nicu ioan.nicu@nsn.com writes:
IN If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
IN -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
IN module again to get it working.
IN Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu ioan.nicu@nsn.com
Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote:
If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning
-EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the
module again to get it working.
Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu ioan.nicu@nsn.com
Doesn't the non-DT case need fixing, too?
12 matches
Mail list logo