Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device tree

2013-10-09 Thread Wolfram Sang
> > WS> Doesn't the non-DT case need fixing, too? > > > > Arguably yes. > > Yes, and it's also a one line fix. Should I do it in a separate > patch or should I change this one and resubmit? Resubmit please. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device tree

2013-10-09 Thread Ionut Nicu
On 09.10.2013 08:14, ext Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> "WS" == Wolfram Sang writes: > > WS> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote: >>> If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning >>> -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the >>> module again to get it

Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device tree

2013-10-09 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "WS" == Wolfram Sang writes: WS> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote: >> If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning >> -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the >> module again to get it working. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu WS> Doesn't

Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device tree

2013-10-09 Thread Peter Korsgaard
WS == Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de writes: WS On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote: If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the module again to get it working. Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu

Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device tree

2013-10-09 Thread Ionut Nicu
On 09.10.2013 08:14, ext Peter Korsgaard wrote: WS == Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de writes: WS On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote: If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the module again to get it

Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device tree

2013-10-09 Thread Wolfram Sang
WS Doesn't the non-DT case need fixing, too? Arguably yes. Yes, and it's also a one line fix. Should I do it in a separate patch or should I change this one and resubmit? Resubmit please. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device tree

2013-10-08 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote: > If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning > -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the > module again to get it working. > > Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu Doesn't the non-DT case need fixing, too? > --- >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device tree

2013-10-08 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "IN" == Ionut Nicu writes: IN> If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning IN> -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the IN> module again to get it working. IN> Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard -- Sorry about disclaimer - It's out of my

[PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device tree

2013-10-08 Thread Ionut Nicu
If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the module again to get it working. Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu --- drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device tree

2013-10-08 Thread Ionut Nicu
If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the module again to get it working. Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu ioan.nicu@nsn.com --- drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff

Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device tree

2013-10-08 Thread Peter Korsgaard
IN == Ionut Nicu ioan.nicu@nsn.com writes: IN If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning IN -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the IN module again to get it working. IN Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu ioan.nicu@nsn.com Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard

Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-mux-gpio: use deferred probing with the device tree

2013-10-08 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:51:50PM +0200, Ionut Nicu wrote: If the i2c-parent bus driver is not loaded, returning -EINVAL will force people to unload and then reload the module again to get it working. Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu ioan.nicu@nsn.com Doesn't the non-DT case need fixing, too?