Hi Linus,
Le mer. 9 déc. 2020 à 9:59, Linus Walleij
a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 5:48 PM Paul Cercueil
wrote:
Introduce a new header , that brings two new
macros:
IF_ENABLED_OR_ELSE() and IF_ENABLED().
I understand what the patch is trying to do, but when we already have
IS_ENABLE
Hi Ard,
Le mer. 9 déc. 2020 à 10:38, Ard Biesheuvel a
écrit :
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 17:49, Paul Cercueil
wrote:
Introduce a new header , that brings two new
macros:
IF_ENABLED_OR_ELSE() and IF_ENABLED().
IF_ENABLED_OR_ELSE(CONFIG_FOO, a, b) evaluates to (a) if CONFIG_FOO
is set
to
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 17:49, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>
> Introduce a new header , that brings two new macros:
> IF_ENABLED_OR_ELSE() and IF_ENABLED().
>
> IF_ENABLED_OR_ELSE(CONFIG_FOO, a, b) evaluates to (a) if CONFIG_FOO is set
> to 'y' or 'm', (b) otherwise. It is used internally to define the
> I
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 5:48 PM Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Introduce a new header , that brings two new macros:
> IF_ENABLED_OR_ELSE() and IF_ENABLED().
I understand what the patch is trying to do, but when we already have
IS_ENABLED() in this syntax becomes a big cognitive
confusion for the mind.
Hi Randy,
Le mar. 8 déc. 2020 à 9:39, Randy Dunlap a
écrit :
On 12/8/20 8:48 AM, Paul Cercueil wrote:
Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil
Hi Paul,
Why not just add these 2 new macros to ?
Maybe you don't want to add the other 2 headers there also?
That means including in , which
causes b
On 12/8/20 8:48 AM, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil
Hi Paul,
Why not just add these 2 new macros to ?
Maybe you don't want to add the other 2 headers there also?
> ---
> include/linux/if_enabled.h | 22 ++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> creat
Introduce a new header , that brings two new macros:
IF_ENABLED_OR_ELSE() and IF_ENABLED().
IF_ENABLED_OR_ELSE(CONFIG_FOO, a, b) evaluates to (a) if CONFIG_FOO is set
to 'y' or 'm', (b) otherwise. It is used internally to define the
IF_ENABLED() macro. The (a) and (b) arguments must be of the same
7 matches
Mail list logo
