On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 16:35 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Work claiming semantics require this operation
> to be SMP-safe.
>
> So we want a strict ordering between the data we
> want the work to handle and the flags that describe
> the work state such that either we claim and we enqueue
>
Work claiming semantics require this operation
to be SMP-safe.
So we want a strict ordering between the data we
want the work to handle and the flags that describe
the work state such that either we claim and we enqueue
the work that will see our data or we fail the claim
but the CPU where the
Work claiming semantics require this operation
to be SMP-safe.
So we want a strict ordering between the data we
want the work to handle and the flags that describe
the work state such that either we claim and we enqueue
the work that will see our data or we fail the claim
but the CPU where the
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 16:35 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Work claiming semantics require this operation
to be SMP-safe.
So we want a strict ordering between the data we
want the work to handle and the flags that describe
the work state such that either we claim and we enqueue
the work
4 matches
Mail list logo