Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: baytrail: Add back Baytrail-T ACPI ID

2014-05-23 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:50:00PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Mika Westerberg > wrote: > > > From: Jin Yao > > > > Now that the x86 dynamic IRQ allocation problem has been resolved with > > commmit 62a08ae2a576 (genirq: x86: Ensure that dynamic irq allocation

Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: baytrail: Add back Baytrail-T ACPI ID

2014-05-22 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > From: Jin Yao > > Now that the x86 dynamic IRQ allocation problem has been resolved with > commmit 62a08ae2a576 (genirq: x86: Ensure that dynamic irq allocation does > not conflict), we can add back Baytrail-T ACPI ID to the pinctrl drive

Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: baytrail: Add back Baytrail-T ACPI ID

2014-05-16 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 02:10:47PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, May 15, 2014 06:28:46 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > From: Jin Yao > > > > Now that the x86 dynamic IRQ allocation problem has been resolved with > > commmit 62a08ae2a576 (genirq: x86: Ensure that dynamic irq allocat

Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: baytrail: Add back Baytrail-T ACPI ID

2014-05-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 06:28:46 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > From: Jin Yao > > Now that the x86 dynamic IRQ allocation problem has been resolved with > commmit 62a08ae2a576 (genirq: x86: Ensure that dynamic irq allocation does > not conflict), we can add back Baytrail-T ACPI ID to the pinctrl d

[PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: baytrail: Add back Baytrail-T ACPI ID

2014-05-15 Thread Mika Westerberg
From: Jin Yao Now that the x86 dynamic IRQ allocation problem has been resolved with commmit 62a08ae2a576 (genirq: x86: Ensure that dynamic irq allocation does not conflict), we can add back Baytrail-T ACPI ID to the pinctrl driver. This makes the driver to work on Asus T100 where it is needed f