Andrew,
thanks for picking up this patch series in -mm. Please drop it.
After discussions with Vegard, I have something better now.
Cheers,
Michael
On 08/16/2016 11:10 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> When changing a pipe's capacity with fcntl(F_SETPIPE_SZ), various
> limits defined by
Andrew,
thanks for picking up this patch series in -mm. Please drop it.
After discussions with Vegard, I have something better now.
Cheers,
Michael
On 08/16/2016 11:10 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> When changing a pipe's capacity with fcntl(F_SETPIPE_SZ), various
> limits defined by
On 08/16/2016 01:10 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
When changing a pipe's capacity with fcntl(F_SETPIPE_SZ), various
limits defined by /proc/sys/fs/pipe-* files are checked to see
if unprivileged users are exceeding limits on memory consumption.
[...]
---
fs/pipe.c | 25
On 08/16/2016 01:10 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
When changing a pipe's capacity with fcntl(F_SETPIPE_SZ), various
limits defined by /proc/sys/fs/pipe-* files are checked to see
if unprivileged users are exceeding limits on memory consumption.
[...]
---
fs/pipe.c | 25
When changing a pipe's capacity with fcntl(F_SETPIPE_SZ), various
limits defined by /proc/sys/fs/pipe-* files are checked to see
if unprivileged users are exceeding limits on memory consumption.
While documenting and testing the operation of these limits I noticed
that, as currently implemented,
When changing a pipe's capacity with fcntl(F_SETPIPE_SZ), various
limits defined by /proc/sys/fs/pipe-* files are checked to see
if unprivileged users are exceeding limits on memory consumption.
While documenting and testing the operation of these limits I noticed
that, as currently implemented,
6 matches
Mail list logo