Re: [PATCH 1/2] rcuscale: add kfree_rcu() single-argument scale test

2021-02-17 Thread Uladzislau Rezki
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:35:02AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 05:27:05PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:00:52PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb

Re: [PATCH 1/2] rcuscale: add kfree_rcu() single-argument scale test

2021-02-16 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 05:27:05PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:00:52PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:46:48PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan

Re: [PATCH 1/2] rcuscale: add kfree_rcu() single-argument scale test

2021-02-15 Thread Uladzislau Rezki
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:00:52PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:46:48PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 09:05:04PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote: > > > > To

Re: [PATCH 1/2] rcuscale: add kfree_rcu() single-argument scale test

2021-02-09 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:46:48PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 09:05:04PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote: > > > To stress and test a single argument of kfree_rcu() call, we > > > should to have

Re: [PATCH 1/2] rcuscale: add kfree_rcu() single-argument scale test

2021-02-09 Thread Uladzislau Rezki
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:46:48PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 09:05:04PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote: > > To stress and test a single argument of kfree_rcu() call, we > > should to have a special coverage for it. We used to have it > > in the test-suite

Re: [PATCH 1/2] rcuscale: add kfree_rcu() single-argument scale test

2021-02-04 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 09:05:04PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote: > To stress and test a single argument of kfree_rcu() call, we > should to have a special coverage for it. We used to have it > in the test-suite related to vmalloc stressing. The reason is > the rcuscale is a correct place

Re: [PATCH 1/2] rcuscale: add kfree_rcu() single-argument scale test

2021-02-04 Thread Uladzislau Rezki
Hello, Paul. > To stress and test a single argument of kfree_rcu() call, we > should to have a special coverage for it. We used to have it > in the test-suite related to vmalloc stressing. The reason is > the rcuscale is a correct place for RCU related things. > > Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki

[PATCH 1/2] rcuscale: add kfree_rcu() single-argument scale test

2021-01-29 Thread Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
To stress and test a single argument of kfree_rcu() call, we should to have a special coverage for it. We used to have it in the test-suite related to vmalloc stressing. The reason is the rcuscale is a correct place for RCU related things. Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) ---