Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Use correct mask for bus_prot_clr

2021-02-01 Thread Bilal Wasim
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:59:47 +0100 Matthias Brugger wrote: > On 01/02/2021 06:45, Bilal Wasim wrote: > > When "bus_prot_reg_update" is false, the driver should use > > INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN for both setting and clearing the bus > > protection. However, the driver does not use this mask for > >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Use correct mask for bus_prot_clr

2021-02-01 Thread Matthias Brugger
On 01/02/2021 06:45, Bilal Wasim wrote: > When "bus_prot_reg_update" is false, the driver should use > INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN for both setting and clearing the bus > protection. However, the driver does not use this mask for > clearing bus protection which causes failure when booting > the

Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Use correct mask for bus_prot_clr

2021-01-31 Thread Hsin-Yi Wang
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 1:45 PM Bilal Wasim wrote: > > When "bus_prot_reg_update" is false, the driver should use > INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN for both setting and clearing the bus > protection. However, the driver does not use this mask for > clearing bus protection which causes failure when booting

[PATCH 1/2] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Use correct mask for bus_prot_clr

2021-01-31 Thread Bilal Wasim
When "bus_prot_reg_update" is false, the driver should use INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN for both setting and clearing the bus protection. However, the driver does not use this mask for clearing bus protection which causes failure when booting the imgtec gpu. Corrected and tested with mt8173 chromebook.