On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:51:49 +0100
Petr Mladek wrote:
> OK, I'll put it on my todo list. Let's see who is faster ;-) And I
> keep my fingers crossed about the OK from Linus and Andrew.
I'll assume they are going to be OK'd. I'll place these patches in a
separate branch and after I finish
On Wed 2014-11-19 11:17:18, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:15:46 +0100
> Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> > On Mon 2014-11-17 14:11:08, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't like the fact that I did a code structure change with this
> > > > patch. This patch should be just a
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:15:46 +0100
Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2014-11-17 14:11:08, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't like the fact that I did a code structure change with this
> > > patch. This patch should be just a simple conversion of len to
> > > seq_buf_used(). I'm going to strip
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:15:46 +0100
Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
On Mon 2014-11-17 14:11:08, Steven Rostedt wrote:
I don't like the fact that I did a code structure change with this
patch. This patch should be just a simple conversion of len to
seq_buf_used(). I'm going to
On Wed 2014-11-19 11:17:18, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:15:46 +0100
Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
On Mon 2014-11-17 14:11:08, Steven Rostedt wrote:
I don't like the fact that I did a code structure change with this
patch. This patch should be just a simple
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:51:49 +0100
Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
OK, I'll put it on my todo list. Let's see who is faster ;-) And I
keep my fingers crossed about the OK from Linus and Andrew.
I'll assume they are going to be OK'd. I'll place these patches in a
separate branch and after
On Mon 2014-11-17 14:11:08, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > I don't like the fact that I did a code structure change with this
> > patch. This patch should be just a simple conversion of len to
> > seq_buf_used(). I'm going to strip this change out and put it before
> > this patch.
>
>
> The
On Mon 2014-11-17 14:11:08, Steven Rostedt wrote:
I don't like the fact that I did a code structure change with this
patch. This patch should be just a simple conversion of len to
seq_buf_used(). I'm going to strip this change out and put it before
this patch.
The function
>
> I don't like the fact that I did a code structure change with this
> patch. This patch should be just a simple conversion of len to
> seq_buf_used(). I'm going to strip this change out and put it before
> this patch.
The function tracing_fill_pipe_page() logic is a little confusing with the
I don't like the fact that I did a code structure change with this
patch. This patch should be just a simple conversion of len to
seq_buf_used(). I'm going to strip this change out and put it before
this patch.
The function tracing_fill_pipe_page() logic is a little confusing with the
use
10 matches
Mail list logo