On 11/07/2017 04:21 AM, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/2017 11:39 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> vgadget_get_frame returns a frame number from 0 to 2046, which
>> may require an expensive division operation to wrap at one lower
>> than the usual number.
>>
>> I can't see any reason for this
On 11/07/2017 11:39 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
vgadget_get_frame returns a frame number from 0 to 2046, which
may require an expensive division operation to wrap at one lower
than the usual number.
I can't see any reason for this, and all other drivers wrap at
a power-of-two number. My best expl
vgadget_get_frame returns a frame number from 0 to 2046, which
may require an expensive division operation to wrap at one lower
than the usual number.
I can't see any reason for this, and all other drivers wrap at
a power-of-two number. My best explanation is that it was a simple
typo, so I'm chan
3 matches
Mail list logo