On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 10:27:00AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 9:55 AM Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> >
> > --- a/fs/read_write.c
> > +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> > @@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ int rw_verify_area(int read_write, struct file *file,
> > const loff_t *ppos, size_t
> >
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 10:27:00AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> And I'd really like to have people (Al?) look at this and go "yeah,
> makes sense". I do think that moving to a model where we wither have a
> (properly locked) file position or no pos pointer at all is the right
> model (ie I'd
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 9:55 AM Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>
> --- a/fs/read_write.c
> +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> @@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ int rw_verify_area(int read_write, struct file *file,
> const loff_t *ppos, size_t
> inode = file_inode(file);
> if (unlikely((ssize_t) count < 0))
>
This amends commit 10dce8af3422 ("fs: stream_open - opener for
stream-like files so that read and write can run simultaneously without
deadlock") in how position is passed into .read()/.write() handler for
stream-like files:
Rasmus noticed that we currently pass 0 as position and ignore any
4 matches
Mail list logo
