Re: [PATCH 1/2] zram: pass gfp from zcomp frontend to backend

2015-11-30 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (11/30/15 16:10), Andrew Morton wrote: > > From: Minchan Kim > > > > Each zcomp backend uses own gfp flag but it's pointless > > because the context they could be called is driven by upper > > layer(ie, zcomp frontend). As well, zcomp frondend could > > call them in different context. One cont

Re: [PATCH 1/2] zram: pass gfp from zcomp frontend to backend

2015-11-30 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 13:23:13 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > From: Minchan Kim > > Each zcomp backend uses own gfp flag but it's pointless > because the context they could be called is driven by upper > layer(ie, zcomp frontend). As well, zcomp frondend could > call them in different context

[PATCH 1/2] zram: pass gfp from zcomp frontend to backend

2015-11-26 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
From: Minchan Kim Each zcomp backend uses own gfp flag but it's pointless because the context they could be called is driven by upper layer(ie, zcomp frontend). As well, zcomp frondend could call them in different context. One context(ie, zram init part) is it should be better to make sure succes

[PATCH 1/2] zram: pass gfp from zcomp frontend to backend

2015-11-25 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
From: Minchan Kim Each zcomp backend uses own gfp flag but it's pointless because the context they could be called is driven by upper layer(ie, zcomp frontend). As well, zcomp frondend could call them in different context. One context(ie, zram init part) is it should be better to make sure succes