On (11/30/15 16:10), Andrew Morton wrote:
> > From: Minchan Kim
> >
> > Each zcomp backend uses own gfp flag but it's pointless
> > because the context they could be called is driven by upper
> > layer(ie, zcomp frontend). As well, zcomp frondend could
> > call them in different context. One cont
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 13:23:13 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky
wrote:
> From: Minchan Kim
>
> Each zcomp backend uses own gfp flag but it's pointless
> because the context they could be called is driven by upper
> layer(ie, zcomp frontend). As well, zcomp frondend could
> call them in different context
From: Minchan Kim
Each zcomp backend uses own gfp flag but it's pointless
because the context they could be called is driven by upper
layer(ie, zcomp frontend). As well, zcomp frondend could
call them in different context. One context(ie, zram init part)
is it should be better to make sure succes
From: Minchan Kim
Each zcomp backend uses own gfp flag but it's pointless
because the context they could be called is driven by upper
layer(ie, zcomp frontend). As well, zcomp frondend could
call them in different context. One context(ie, zram init part)
is it should be better to make sure succes
4 matches
Mail list logo