Re: [PATCH 1/2 linux-next] gfs2: check rename2 flags at once

2017-05-04 Thread Bob Peterson
- Original Message - | There's no need to update flags in gfs2_rename2() | This will ease whiteout addition. | | Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick | --- Hi Fabian, Your patches look good. I'll push them to the for-next branch of our repo after the merge window is closed.

Re: [PATCH 1/2 linux-next] gfs2: check rename2 flags at once

2017-05-04 Thread Bob Peterson
- Original Message - | There's no need to update flags in gfs2_rename2() | This will ease whiteout addition. | | Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick | --- Hi Fabian, Your patches look good. I'll push them to the for-next branch of our repo after the merge window is closed. Regards, Bob

[PATCH 1/2 linux-next] gfs2: check rename2 flags at once

2017-05-03 Thread Fabian Frederick
There's no need to update flags in gfs2_rename2() This will ease whiteout addition. Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick --- fs/gfs2/inode.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/gfs2/inode.c b/fs/gfs2/inode.c index 9f605ea..9698796 100644 ---

[PATCH 1/2 linux-next] gfs2: check rename2 flags at once

2017-05-03 Thread Fabian Frederick
There's no need to update flags in gfs2_rename2() This will ease whiteout addition. Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick --- fs/gfs2/inode.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/gfs2/inode.c b/fs/gfs2/inode.c index 9f605ea..9698796 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/inode.c