On Tuesday 03 May 2016 11:04:23 liviu.du...@arm.com wrote:
> > > + list_splice_init(&bridge->windows, &resources);
> > > + b->sysdata = bridge->sysdata;
> >
> > Does the sysdata not become effectively obsolete after this series? My
> > understanding is that it's primarily used to store driver-
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 09:09:43AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 01:01:37AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > This patch makes the existing 'pci_host_bridge' structure a proper device
> > that is usable by PCI host drivers in a more standard way. In addition
> > to the existi
On Monday 02 May 2016 09:35:41 Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> > +int pci_register_host(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> > {
> > int error;
> > - struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> > struct pci_bus *b, *b2;
> > struct resource_entry *window, *n;
> > + LIST_HEAD(resources);
> >
On 04/30/2016 01:01 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
This patch makes the existing 'pci_host_bridge' structure a proper device
that is usable by PCI host drivers in a more standard way. In addition
to the existing pci_scan_bus, pci_scan_root_bus, pci_scan_root_bus_msi,
and pci_create_root_bus interfaces,
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 01:01:37AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This patch makes the existing 'pci_host_bridge' structure a proper device
> that is usable by PCI host drivers in a more standard way. In addition
> to the existing pci_scan_bus, pci_scan_root_bus, pci_scan_root_bus_msi,
> and pci_cre
This patch makes the existing 'pci_host_bridge' structure a proper device
that is usable by PCI host drivers in a more standard way. In addition
to the existing pci_scan_bus, pci_scan_root_bus, pci_scan_root_bus_msi,
and pci_create_root_bus interfaces, this unfortunately means having to
add yet ano
6 matches
Mail list logo
