Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily

2014-05-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, May 16, 2014 10:27:37 AM Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, 16 May 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Currently, some subsystems (e.g. PCI and the ACPI PM domain) have to > > resume all runtime-suspended devices during system suspend, mostly > > because thos

Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily

2014-05-16 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Currently, some subsystems (e.g. PCI and the ACPI PM domain) have to > resume all runtime-suspended devices during system suspend, mostly > because those devices may need to be reprogrammed due to different > wakeup sett

[PATCH 1/3] PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily

2014-05-15 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki Currently, some subsystems (e.g. PCI and the ACPI PM domain) have to resume all runtime-suspended devices during system suspend, mostly because those devices may need to be reprogrammed due to different wakeup settings for system sleep and for runtime PM. For some devices