On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 10:53 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 March 2015 10:31:07 Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since we support devicetree, we don't need MACH_* to build a working
> > kernel. This is true even for our v7 soc. We intend to use it to reduce
> > numbers of drivers
On Wednesday 04 March 2015 10:31:07 Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since we support devicetree, we don't need MACH_* to build a working
> kernel. This is true even for our v7 soc. We intend to use it to reduce
> numbers of drivers in product kernel binary.
> Most drivers are shared among the same
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 10:53 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 04 March 2015 10:31:07 Yingjoe Chen wrote:
Hi,
Since we support devicetree, we don't need MACH_* to build a working
kernel. This is true even for our v7 soc. We intend to use it to reduce
numbers of drivers in product
On Wednesday 04 March 2015 10:31:07 Yingjoe Chen wrote:
Hi,
Since we support devicetree, we don't need MACH_* to build a working
kernel. This is true even for our v7 soc. We intend to use it to reduce
numbers of drivers in product kernel binary.
Most drivers are shared among the same SoCs
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 11:11 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:51:57AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 February 2015 17:07:22 Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 15:13 +0800, Hongzhou Yang wrote:
> > > > From: Hongzhou Yang
> > > >
> > > > The
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 11:11 +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:51:57AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 17:07:22 Yingjoe Chen wrote:
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 15:13 +0800, Hongzhou Yang wrote:
From: Hongzhou Yang hongzhou.y...@mediatek.com
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:51:57AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 February 2015 17:07:22 Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 15:13 +0800, Hongzhou Yang wrote:
> > > From: Hongzhou Yang
> > >
> > > The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC,
> > >
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 17:07:22 Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 15:13 +0800, Hongzhou Yang wrote:
> > From: Hongzhou Yang
> >
> > The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC,
> > and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it.
> > Add
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 15:13 +0800, Hongzhou Yang wrote:
> From: Hongzhou Yang
>
> The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC,
> and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it.
> Add config options so we can build for one SoC only.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 17:07:22 Yingjoe Chen wrote:
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 15:13 +0800, Hongzhou Yang wrote:
From: Hongzhou Yang hongzhou.y...@mediatek.com
The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC,
and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 15:13 +0800, Hongzhou Yang wrote:
From: Hongzhou Yang hongzhou.y...@mediatek.com
The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC,
and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it.
Add config options so we can build for one SoC only.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:51:57AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 17:07:22 Yingjoe Chen wrote:
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 15:13 +0800, Hongzhou Yang wrote:
From: Hongzhou Yang hongzhou.y...@mediatek.com
The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Hongzhou Yang
wrote:
> From: Hongzhou Yang
>
> The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC,
> and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it.
> Add config options so we can build for one SoC only.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Hongzhou Yang
hongzhou.y...@mediatek.com wrote:
From: Hongzhou Yang hongzhou.y...@mediatek.com
The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC,
and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it.
Add config options so we can
14 matches
Mail list logo
