On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 07:36, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 05:37:49PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >
> > I think this patch was lost, although you replied that the entire set
> > is applied.
> >
> > Can you pick it up?
>
> I think it was not applicable because the following
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 05:37:49PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> I think this patch was lost, although you replied that the entire set
> is applied.
>
> Can you pick it up?
I think it was not applicable because the following had already
been applied:
commit
On Fri, 4 Sept 2020 at 10:28, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:29:52PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Pointers should not be printed because they might leak important
> > information about address space layout. Use %p to hash the value. This
> > also fixes compilation
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:29:52PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Pointers should not be printed because they might leak important
> information about address space layout. Use %p to hash the value. This
> also fixes compilation warnings on 32-bit architecture:
>
>
Pointers should not be printed because they might leak important
information about address space layout. Use %p to hash the value. This
also fixes compilation warnings on 32-bit architecture:
drivers/crypto/sa2ul.c:1486:33: warning: cast from pointer to integer of
different size
5 matches
Mail list logo