On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 09:07 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:46:20PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
>> > commit c4e00daaa96d3a0786f1f4fe6456281c60ef9a16 changed __dev_printk
>> > in a way that broke dynamic-debug's ability to
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 09:07 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:46:20PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> > commit c4e00daaa96d3a0786f1f4fe6456281c60ef9a16 changed __dev_printk
> > in a way that broke dynamic-debug's ability to control the dynamic
> > prefix of dev_dbg(dev,..), but not
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:46:20PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> commit c4e00daaa96d3a0786f1f4fe6456281c60ef9a16 changed __dev_printk
> in a way that broke dynamic-debug's ability to control the dynamic
> prefix of dev_dbg(dev,..), but not dev_dbg(NULL,..) or pr_debug(..),
> which is why it wasnt noti
commit c4e00daaa96d3a0786f1f4fe6456281c60ef9a16 changed __dev_printk
in a way that broke dynamic-debug's ability to control the dynamic
prefix of dev_dbg(dev,..), but not dev_dbg(NULL,..) or pr_debug(..),
which is why it wasnt noticed sooner.
When dev==NULL, __dev_printk() just calls printk(), whi
commit c4e00daaa96d3a0786f1f4fe6456281c60ef9a16 changed __dev_printk
in a way that broke dynamic-debug's ability to control the dynamic
prefix of dev_dbg(dev,..), but not dev_dbg(NULL,..) or pr_debug(..),
which is why it wasnt noticed sooner.
When dev==NULL, __dev_printk() just calls printk(), whi
5 matches
Mail list logo