On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 09:22:28 +0200
Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 8:46 PM Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:50:03 +0200
> > Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> >
> > > Since a main requirement for an IIO device is to have a parent device
> > > object, it makes
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 8:46 PM Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:50:03 +0200
> Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
>
> > Since a main requirement for an IIO device is to have a parent device
> > object, it makes sense to attach more of the IIO device's objects to the
> > lifetime of the
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:50:03 +0200
Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> Since a main requirement for an IIO device is to have a parent device
> object, it makes sense to attach more of the IIO device's objects to the
> lifetime of the parent object, to clean up the code.
> The idea is to also provide a
Since a main requirement for an IIO device is to have a parent device
object, it makes sense to attach more of the IIO device's objects to the
lifetime of the parent object, to clean up the code.
The idea is to also provide a base example that is more up-to-date with
what's going on lately with
4 matches
Mail list logo